Will the collective memory of the internet lead to cultural stasis?
That's the interesting and brand new, exciting question I've been re-asking myself.
I
was going to write, like many others have, about Latitude festival
(where we played and stayed last week), but - unlike other people who
have written about it - I don't even know if there's anything to write
about.
It is thought that fiction allows you to empathise better with people and situations (see: Alien).
It could be seen almost as a kind of exposure therapy to help us
contextualise future experience. This is usually something said of
written fiction, but I prefer the example of when the band went to
Slovenia and while the vast, cool mountains of that country filled all of us with a deep sense of joy and peace, I couldn't escape the voice in
the back of my head that said “Yeah, but I've seen it all before in Skyrim.” (For the uncultured swine: Skyrim is a video game.) The only difference is that in Skyrim, people talk to me.
So
the reviews that I've read of the festival mostly consist of a
dispassionate list of acts, and submissions for an apparent competition
to see who can least creatively describe tents and trees and people in a
field. And I wonder if that's because where in decades past there would
be a new review every year, nowadays every review or story from every year
remains available online, so there's nothing really left to say, or,
more importantly, for the reader to know. If 2016 was basically as good
as 2014, you have to write something the same, but different, and only
different for the sake of having a review of the 2016 version of the event.
But
is it possible that we have been so exposed to this kind of permanently
available media (Photo no: 3429485325485439464348543574584345. Caption
read: “Look! Young people at Glastonbury covered in mud!”) that
the glut of available descriptions of the event and subsequent
'exposure therapy' has desensitised us to some degree to the actual
experience?
("Ha! Look! Someone diving into the mud
pool!" "There are twenty videos on the Guardian 2013 archived live-feed
of the best festival-mud-dives 2010-2012. They're much better if not
exactly the same." "OK. I'm off to watch Paul McCartney again." etc.)
There
are categories and formats that dictate whether or not the content
(reviews, media, etc.) - and the thoughts and perceptions contained
within - can be recognised as such. It appears to me that what matters
in a (hypothetically) desenstitised world is not what the highlights of
the festival were, but only that there were highlights. The
answer to “What were the highlights?” no longer necessitates the name of an act or
event, but more “What were the highlights, you ask!? The highlights
were good!” because the elements of a review (and to some extent our own
personal expectations of our experience) have been so categorised that
it matters only that the criteria for a review or experience were
fulfilled, rather than a more abstract sense of what elements made this
experience different/of and/or better/worse/tinsel than/from the rest/others./
So
are we in danger of entering a period of cultural stasis brought about
by the permanence of electronic memory inadequately servicing a desensitised audience who respond to contextual format
(commonly labelled content) over actual experiential and/or narratively justified content?
On
another topic, we've been practising hard through the heat and the
haze, ready for Blue Dot festival this weekend. It's a festival not only
about music, but about space and science and stuff, which we like, so
that should be interesting even though I could just look up and the sky
and be all like “I've seen it all before.”
We're also booking dates and that, for touring and stuff. Even though we've done that already.
We're also booking dates and that, for touring and stuff. Even though we've done that already.
You've already read that bit.
(We're also rescheduling the launch gig. Sorry about all that. Trewin is much better than he was. It was a bad few days. We will make it up to you.)
So it's Friday. The goose is getting fatter and I've got to find some stories to tell.
Grin at someone this weekend. It doesn't matter who.
And grin. Don't smile. Grin. If you smile, I'll know. It's not the same. Give them a knowing grin.
I'm telling you, it's not the same.
And I will know.
Tim
PS.
I promise you something fun from Blue Dot. I promise. Perhaps a
treatise on common wheel-arch design and the modern people carrier. Or a
drawing of me rubbing a tank.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Achieve.
All milky and lava-lamp-ish the street-lights reflecting on my big red car bonnet as I curl it round at night all sound and echoing engine...
-
Has anyone figured this stuff out yet? There's no excuse for not knowing where you are and why you're there (here). You've ...
-
Where are we, then? What are we up to, eh? Are you hungry, are you? Are you hungry for more? Are you? I am. Where are we, then? Wel...
No comments:
Post a Comment